« Calculus | Main | VAT Seems Sensible To Me »

The Bar Behind Bars?

This week I combine a news post with the Friday song - the latter being vageuly themed on the former.

Before the musical entertainment however - compare and contrast

11/1/08

We’ve already received many completed contracts from both solicitors and advocates and we’re expecting all contracts to be accepted and returned within the deadline. (emphasis added)

Today

We are aware that a very high proportion of advocates have still to sign VHCC advocates’ contracts, and although those contracts do not have to be returned until 21 January, the present indications are that a substantial number of advocates are currently intending not to do so.

This has created sufficient panic to occasion the following "legal advice" from the LSC to the Bar Council:

The Bar Council is, we believe, aware that it is unlawful under Chapter I of the Competition Act 1998 and a criminal offence under section 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 for parties, including members of the Bar, to collude in the terms on which they offer their services. All that is required for a breach of the Competition Act is a “concurrence of wills” or, as recent case law has established, that information supplied by any party is supplied to another with the intention of, or knowledge that, it will facilitate the making of an anti-competitive agreement. Under the Enterprise Act secrecy concerning the steps taken to enter into an arrangement to limit the supply of services is presumed by practitioners to establish the necessary dishonesty. (You can read the whole letter at the "today" link above or via the Bar Council link below).

The LSC goes on to implore the BC to "provide this advice itself" to its members. Their suitably measured response is here.

Is this the point at which we cease "being all in this together" as the LSC resorts to 11th hour legal threats to its erstwhile "partners" to try and save a flagship initiative? Will they succeed?

I have made my willingness to run the "No. 6 are Innocent" campaign, know to Tim Collins and may well be making requests for readers to bake cakes containing files later next week.

The song - obvious wasn't it:

Comments

I bet the Counsel they use for legal advice does not work at "Legal Aid" rates

Posted by: AnonMike January 18, 2008 2:31 PM

Thank god for the bar

Posted by: anon January 18, 2008 7:32 PM

Thanks for due to this spectacular post. i'm invariably near to the present up out for content materials and was lucky to uncover you on yahoo i am going to absolutely be again nonetheless once more againg to establish what other spectacular content material material you post.

Sorry for the huge review, but I'm really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it's the right choice for you.

you're really a good webmaster. The site loading speed is incredible. It seems that you're doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you've done a excellent job on this topic!

Great work! This is the type of info that should be shared around the net. Shame on Google for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my web site . Thanks =)

Thanks , I've just been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I've discovered till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?

Post a comment